Re: [Mesa-dev] boolean usage in gallium

PSA - I've pushed the changes which flip the gallium APIs and their direct users from boolean -> bool. I've tried to take every precaution against breaking compilation, but it's conceivable something got missed in the repository-wide update. However fixing it up should be trivial - let me know if y

Re: [Mesa-dev] boolean usage in gallium

On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 00:08 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Ken pointed out on IRC today that there was still a lot of "boolean" > (vs bool/_Bool) usage in gallium. In fact, many interfaces are > specified with boolean. > > I had it in my mind that I had at some point removed most boolean > usage, but

Re: [Mesa-dev] boolean usage in gallium

Yep. It's better to just use C99 bool everywhere. Jose On 30/06/2019 06:00, Marek Olšák wrote: > boolean predates c99 support in MSVC. I think there is no reason for > boolean in gallium now. > > Marek > > On Sat., Jun. 29, 2019, 00:09 Ilia Mirkin, > wrote: > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] boolean usage in gallium

boolean predates c99 support in MSVC. I think there is no reason for boolean in gallium now. Marek On Sat., Jun. 29, 2019, 00:09 Ilia Mirkin, wrote: > Ken pointed out on IRC today that there was still a lot of "boolean" > (vs bool/_Bool) usage in gallium. In fact, many interfaces are > specifie

[Mesa-dev] boolean usage in gallium

Ken pointed out on IRC today that there was still a lot of "boolean" (vs bool/_Bool) usage in gallium. In fact, many interfaces are specified with boolean. I had it in my mind that I had at some point removed most boolean usage, but that is just not the case - first of all, the interfaces remain w