On 04/24/2012 01:57 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
conformance/programs/program-test.html: 1 tests failed
PASS linking should fail with in-us
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > conformance/programs/program-test.html: 1 tests failed
> > > > >
> > >
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> > wrote:
> > > > > conformance/programs/program-test.html: 1 tests failed
> > > >
> > > > > PASS linking should fail with in-use former
> > > > conformance/renderbuffers/framebuffer-object-attachment.html: 3
> > > > tests failed
> > >
> > > > Create and attach depthStencil renderbuffer
> > > > PASS depthStencilBuffer = gl.createRenderbuffer() is non-null.
> > > > PASS getError was expected value: NO_ERROR :
> > > > PASS gl.getRend
- Original Message -
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> wrote:
> > > > conformance/programs/program-test.html: 1 tests failed
> > >
> > > > PASS linking should fail with in-use formerly good program,
> > > > with
> > > > new bad shader attached
> > > > FAIL getEr
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
> > > conformance/programs/program-test.html: 1 tests failed
> >
> > > PASS linking should fail with in-use formerly good program, with
> > > new bad shader attached
> > > FAIL getError expected: NO_ERROR. Was INVALID_OPERATION : draw
Here's an update on the status of these failures. Scroll down to the part about
program-test.html for the real news.
> i965 driver:
>
> Results: (8866 of 8879 passed)
>
> > Failures:
> > conformance/context/context-attributes-alpha-depth-stencil-antialias.html:
> > 1 tests failed
The part that
bject: Re: [Mesa-dev] WebGL WG interested in 1.0.1 conformance test results
on real drivers
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:32:46 -0700 (PDT), Jeff Gilbert
wrote:
> It depends how much of the spec its in violation of.
>
> Hopefully, querying GL_RENDERBUFFER_SAMPLES on the RB should show it
> with 0
c Anholt" , "Jeff Gilbert"
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:41:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] WebGL WG interested in 1.0.1 conformance test results
on real drivers
> GL_MAX_SAMPLES tells you how many samples you can ask for from a
> multisample re
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:43:07 -0700 (PDT), Jeff Gilbert
wrote:
> Ok, great. Do you have any idea if RENDERBUFFER_SAMPLES will return the lie
> or 0/1?
It returns the lie.
pgpCRp8B2gGnI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:32:46 -0700 (PDT), Jeff Gilbert
wrote:
> It depends how much of the spec its in violation of.
>
> Hopefully, querying GL_RENDERBUFFER_SAMPLES on the RB should show it
> with 0 or 1 sample(s). Per spec, this is not okay, since
> RENDERBUFFER_SAMPLES is guaranteed to be >= t
> GL_MAX_SAMPLES tells you how many samples you can ask for from a
> multisample renderbuffer (GL 3.0 spec page 285), while to ask about
> the
> number of samples in a particular GLX visuals you have to check the
> GLX_SAMPLE_BUFFERS_ARB of the visual (GL_ARB_multisample spec). We
> currently expo
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:53:12 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
> > > > i965 driver:
> > > >
> > > > Results: (8866 of 8879 passed)
> > > >
> > > > > Failures:
> > > > > conformance/context/context-attributes-alpha-depth-stencil-antialias.html:
> > > > > 1 tests failed
> > > >
> > > > > PASS web
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:41:21 -0700 (PDT), Jose Fonseca
wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Is it possible to run just a subtest? It would be nice to apitrace
> > what's going on in this testcase, but if I run the whole test I won't
> > be
> > able to find where the failure was in the trace
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 confo
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> > > wrote:
> > > > In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 conformance tests
> > > > fully
> > > > passing on multiple,
- Original Message -
> Is it possible to run just a subtest? It would be nice to apitrace
> what's going on in this testcase, but if I run the whole test I won't
> be
> able to find where the failure was in the trace.
apitrace/scripts/retracediff.py allows to run against a software render
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> > wrote:
> > > In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 conformance tests
> > > fully
> > > passing on multiple, real drivers, before we can claim that WebGL
> > > h
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
> wrote:
> > In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 conformance tests
> > fully
> > passing on multiple, real drivers, before we can claim that WebGL
> > has
> > conformant implementations.
> >
> > So we
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Benoit Jacob
wrote:
> In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 conformance tests fully
> passing on multiple, real drivers, before we can claim that WebGL has
> conformant implementations.
>
> So we are trying to get people to run these conformance t
Hi,
In the WebGL WG, we need to have WebGL 1.0.1 conformance tests fully passing on
multiple, real drivers, before we can claim that WebGL has conformant
implementations.
So we are trying to get people to run these conformance tests on development
versions of their favorite browsers, using rec
21 matches
Mail list logo
