On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> Yeah, that is fine... I'm lagging a bit and need a few more days too.
>
> Me to, I have some DRI interface changes I like to get into the
> release, I'm hoping to send them out for
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 19:01:55 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> 8/17: Release Mesa 8.0.5. I'll send out another pick-list on Friday
> or Saturday, and pick things over on Monday or Tuesday.
>
Hi Ian,
is there an updated plan for 8.0.5?
Cheers,
Julien
_
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 07:26 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>>
>>> After the big announcement at SIGGRAPH, I want to discuss plans for
>>> upcoming
>>> Mesa releases. This is basically inline with w
On 08/20/2012 07:26 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
After the big announcement at SIGGRAPH, I want to discuss plans for upcoming
Mesa releases. This is basically inline with what we discussed a few months
ago, but there are a couple changes. I know
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> After the big announcement at SIGGRAPH, I want to discuss plans for upcoming
> Mesa releases. This is basically inline with what we discussed a few months
> ago, but there are a couple changes. I know a lot of people have been doing
> a lot
After the big announcement at SIGGRAPH, I want to discuss plans for
upcoming Mesa releases. This is basically inline with what we discussed
a few months ago, but there are a couple changes. I know a lot of
people have been doing a lot of work all across the graphics stack, so I
want to make s
After the big announcement at SIGGRAPH, I want to discuss plans for
upcoming Mesa releases. This is basically inline with what we discussed
a few months ago, but there are a couple changes. I know a lot of
people have been doing a lot of work all across the graphics stack, so I
want to make s
On 06/29/2012 07:29 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:38:11PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
doing stable releases
- Original Message -
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:38:11PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
> > the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
> > doing stable releases monthly and feature releases every six
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:38:11PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
> the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
> doing stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months.
> This set of dates basically
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose the
> following set of release dates. We had previously discussed doing stable
> releases monthly and feature releases every six months. This set of dates
> basically reflec
On 05/18/2012 08:06 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:51 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/06/2012 01:12 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrot
On 05/18/2012 03:30 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:51:45PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
I've picked a bunch of these over. I didn't take ae92180 because it
enables an extension (GL_ARB_draw_instanced) that wasn't previously
enabled on 8.0.x. I'd do some more tomorrow.
The c
On 05/18/2012 12:51 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/06/2012 01:12 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
Part of the reason there are so few ch
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:51:45PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> I've picked a bunch of these over. I didn't take ae92180 because it
> enables an extension (GL_ARB_draw_instanced) that wasn't previously
> enabled on 8.0.x. I'd do some more tomorrow.
The commit message says it disables it for p
On 05/06/2012 01:12 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
about cherry pi
On 05/17/2012 04:54 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
Part of the reason th
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Part of the reason there are so few changes is
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>
> >>Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
> >>about cherry picking fixes over. :) Having reg
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
about cherry picking fixes over. :) Having regularly planned
releases (with reminder messages) should help keep people on
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
> about cherry picking fixes over. :) Having regularly planned
> releases (with reminder messages) should help keep people on track.
I'm still missing patches mark
On 05/04/2012 07:33 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
- Original Message -
To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
doing stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months.
This set of date
On 05/03/2012 05:03 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:38 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed doing
stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months. This
set
- Original Message -
> To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
> the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
> doing stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months.
> This set of dates basically reflects that.
>
> I should be
On 05/03/2012 03:38 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed doing
stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months. This
set of dates basically reflects that.
I should
To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose the
following set of release dates. We had previously discussed doing
stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months. This set
of dates basically reflects that.
I should be able to package up most of these, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/2011 12:13 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> We've accumulated a lot of fixes in the 7.10 branch, so it seems like we
> should do a 7.10.3 release soon. How do Friday (6/10) or Monday (6/13)
> sound?
>
> There's also a huge number of changes sitting
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We've accumulated a lot of fixes in the 7.10 branch, so it seems like we
> should do a 7.10.3 release soon. How do Friday (6/10) or Monday (6/13)
> sound?
I am for Monday. There are still so
On 06/07/2011 01:13 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We've accumulated a lot of fixes in the 7.10 branch, so it seems like we
should do a 7.10.3 release soon. How do Friday (6/10) or Monday (6/13)
sound?
There's also a huge number of changes sitting in mast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We've accumulated a lot of fixes in the 7.10 branch, so it seems like we
should do a 7.10.3 release soon. How do Friday (6/10) or Monday (6/13)
sound?
There's also a huge number of changes sitting in master, and quite a few
distros are shipping "7.11
30 matches
Mail list logo
