Hey Marek,
On 18 November 2016 at 19:09, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Kai Wasserbäch
> wrote:
>> wouldn't a tool like Phabricator be much better for reviewing and reliably
>> tracking whether a patch has landed or not? Especially if you use it in
>> combination with Arca
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Kai Wasserbäch
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> Nicolai Hähnle wrote on 18.11.2016 17:48:
>> On 18.11.2016 16:56, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 18 November 2016 at 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
[...]
> Sp
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 November 2016 at 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 November 2016 at 23:42, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 15
Hi everybody,
Nicolai Hähnle wrote on 18.11.2016 17:48:
> On 18.11.2016 16:56, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 18 November 2016 at 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
Speaking of patchwork, mostly I'm fine with it. There are some
On 18.11.2016 16:56, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 18 November 2016 at 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 17 November 2016 at 23:42, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák
On 18 November 2016 at 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 17 November 2016 at 23:42, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Tue, Nov
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 17 November 2016 at 23:42, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 15
On 17 November 2016 at 23:42, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
> I think that
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going
>>
On 15 November 2016 at 16:57, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going
>>> to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the sta
On Nov 15, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ian Romanick" wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2016 02:31 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > A long time ago, patch authors were tasked with cherry-picking their
> > patches to stable branches. Today we Cc
> > mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org and Emil rebases those patches onto
> > stable.
On 11/14/2016 02:31 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> A long time ago, patch authors were tasked with cherry-picking their
> patches to stable branches. Today we Cc
> mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org and Emil rebases those patches onto
> stable. Cc'ing the list happens even on patches sent for their first
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going
>> to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the stable ML,
>> because that is redundant. Yet, many people do
On 15 November 2016 at 16:13, Marek Olšák wrote:
> I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going
> to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the stable ML,
> because that is redundant. Yet, many people do that. I would go even
> further and say that any unreviewed
I think that if people add the Cc stable tag to patches that are going
to land in master first, they shouldn't send it to the stable ML,
because that is redundant. Yet, many people do that. I would go even
further and say that any unreviewed patches shouldn't be sent to the
stable ML. At least that
Hi Matt,
On 14 November 2016 at 22:31, Matt Turner wrote:
> A long time ago, patch authors were tasked with cherry-picking their
> patches to stable branches. Today we Cc
> mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org and Emil rebases those patches onto
> stable. Cc'ing the list happens even on patches sent
A long time ago, patch authors were tasked with cherry-picking their
patches to stable branches. Today we Cc
mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org and Emil rebases those patches onto
stable. Cc'ing the list happens even on patches sent for their first
review that are ultimately rejected, creating a lot
17 matches
Mail list logo
