I had a chance to look at the patches in detail now. Thanks for working
on this, it should be quite useful!
With the remark on patch 1 addressed, patches 1, 2, and 4-9 are
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle
I've sent some more extensive comments on patch 3, and I already
explained that I don't like
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 25.06.2017 09:18, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> > On 25.06.2017 03:31, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> >> There are still a handful of piglit tests failing and I'm yet to test
> >> that there are no regressions in the non-packed path, but I'd really
>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017, at 12:18 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 25.06.2017 03:31, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > There are still a handful of piglit tests failing and I'm yet to test
> > that there are no regressions in the non-packed path, but I'd really
> > like some feedback on the approach as Dave has
On 25.06.2017 09:18, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 25.06.2017 03:31, Timothy Arceri wrote:
There are still a handful of piglit tests failing and I'm yet to test
that there are no regressions in the non-packed path, but I'd really
like some feedback on the approach as Dave has flagged it as a possible
On 25.06.2017 03:31, Timothy Arceri wrote:
There are still a handful of piglit tests failing and I'm yet to test
that there are no regressions in the non-packed path, but I'd really
like some feedback on the approach as Dave has flagged it as a possible
controversial tgsi change.
In order to avo
There are still a handful of piglit tests failing and I'm yet to test
that there are no regressions in the non-packed path, but I'd really
like some feedback on the approach as Dave has flagged it as a possible
controversial tgsi change.
In order to avoid complicated swizzling and array element ad
I've been working on this on and off and wanted to get some feedback on
the approach I've taken before putting to much time in fixing the remaining
bugs. There are around 150 piglit tests still failing.
The main goal of this series is to reduce the cpu overhead cause by
_mesa_propagate_uniforms_to
