On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm considering modifying the gallium rasterizer state to remove most of
> the cw/ccw flags and replace them with front/back or other concepts
> closer to what GL is using.
>
> This is primarily motivated by the fact that noone other than GL
On 14.05.2010 16:34, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> On 14.05.2010 14:10, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> I'm considering modifying the gallium rasterizer state to remove most of
>> the cw/ccw flags and replace them with front/back or other concepts
>> closer to what GL is using.
>>
>> This is primarily motiv
On 14.05.2010 14:10, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm considering modifying the gallium rasterizer state to remove most of
> the cw/ccw flags and replace them with front/back or other concepts
> closer to what GL is using.
>
> This is primarily motivated by the fact that noone other than GL uses a
> lo
Keith Whitwell wrote:
I'm considering modifying the gallium rasterizer state to remove most of
the cw/ccw flags and replace them with front/back or other concepts
closer to what GL is using.
This is primarily motivated by the fact that noone other than GL uses a
lot of this state, and where they
I'm considering modifying the gallium rasterizer state to remove most of
the cw/ccw flags and replace them with front/back or other concepts
closer to what GL is using.
This is primarily motivated by the fact that noone other than GL uses a
lot of this state, and where they do, they tend to use th
