Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-22 Thread Roland Scheidegger
On 22.05.2010 00:53, José Fonseca wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:04 -0700, Roland Scheidegger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. >> It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important >> changes in there are about blits... >> >> Here's

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-22 Thread Roland Scheidegger
On 21.05.2010 23:40, Xavier Chantry wrote: > Ok, after looking at how some other drivers were updated, I thought > nouveau needed bigger changes than that. > Jakob just pushed a simple build fix, and now nv50 builds and runs (almost > ;)). > > I just noticed 5 piglit regressions : > fbo/fbo-copyp

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-21 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:04 -0700, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. > It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important > changes in there are about blits... > > Here's a short summary what this is about: > blits now

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-21 Thread Xavier Chantry
Ok, after looking at how some other drivers were updated, I thought nouveau needed bigger changes than that. Jakob just pushed a simple build fix, and now nv50 builds and runs (almost ;)). I just noticed 5 piglit regressions : fbo/fbo-copypix fbo/fbo-copyteximage general/scissor-copypixels texturi

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-21 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. > It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important > changes in there are about blits... > > Here's a short summary what this is about: > blits now op

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-19 Thread Roland Scheidegger
On 19.05.2010 00:54, Marek Olšák wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Roland Scheidegger > wrote: > > On 18.05.2010 22:23, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Roland Scheidegger > mailto:srol...@vmware.com>> wrote: > >> Hi, >

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-18 Thread Marek Olšák
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > On 18.05.2010 22:23, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Roland Scheidegger > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. > >> It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the concep

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-18 Thread Roland Scheidegger
On 18.05.2010 22:23, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Roland Scheidegger > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. >> It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important >> changes in there are about blits... >> >> Here'

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-18 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. > It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important > changes in there are about blits... > > Here's a short summary what this is about: > blits now op

[Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

2010-05-18 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Hi, I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon. It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important changes in there are about blits... Here's a short summary what this is about: blits now operate on resources, not surfaces (surface_copy/fill -> resource_copy/fill_