On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:09:38PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin
> wrote:
> > On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
> >> fixes squashed-in.
> >>
> >> git://people.freedesktop.or
On 09/27/2012 12:19 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 09/26/2012 10:55 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are
On 09/26/2012 10:55 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
clean',
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>> Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
>>> clean',
>>> but thats probably on purpose (do the generated
On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>> Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
>> clean',
>> but thats probably on purpose (do the generated files get shipped in the
>> release tarball?),
>> I should've r
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin
wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
>> fixes squashed-in.
>>
>> git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa automake-gallium2
>
> Nice progress!
>
> I was able to bui
On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
> fixes squashed-in.
>
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa automake-gallium2
Nice progress!
I was able to build it after reversing the 'if' below.
It doesn't load though:
l
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes in the b
Matt Turner writes:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>>> >
>>> > No. People
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>>
>> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
>> large chunks are making nearly identic
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:00:23AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slu
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:00:23AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Installation is part of the testing p
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Török Edwin
wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
>> branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
>> week and break your stuff, I'm sorry, but you didn
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>> wrote:
>> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>> >
>> > No. People test code, not build systems.
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:57:20PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
> > branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
> > week and break your stuff, I'm sorry,
On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
> branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
> week and break your stuff, I'm sorry, but you didn't test.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa/lo
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
> >
> > No. People test code, not build systems.
>
> I invite you to reread the subject of this email.
So you do
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
>> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>
> No. People test code, not build systems.
I invite you to reread the subject of this email.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:02:26AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> > With this branch, top level lib directory is not created, so it's impossible
> > to test mesa without installing it first.
>
> Indeed. This has been planned for a while.
Ne
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> With this branch, top level lib directory is not created, so it's impossible
> to test mesa without installing it first.
Indeed. This has been planned for a while. Installation is part of the
testing procedure, after all.
Do DESTDIR=... ma
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:35:31AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
> >
> > I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> > large chunks are making nearly identica
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes in the b
This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
directories. Plus, incorrect changes in the build system should be
detectable with testing. As such, I won'
25 matches
Mail list logo
