On 30.10.2015 17:44, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 30.10.2015 08:11, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not familiar with patchwork yet and have a related question: on my
>>> push, I got the following error message related to patchwork:
>>>
>>> re
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 30.10.2015 08:11, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>
>> I am not familiar with patchwork yet and have a related question: on my
>> push, I got the following error message related to patchwork:
>>
>> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev
>> f75f21a
On 30.10.2015 08:11, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>
> I am not familiar with patchwork yet and have a related question: on my
> push, I got the following error message related to patchwork:
>
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev
> f75f21a24ae2dd83507f3d4d8007f0fcfe6db802
>
> Apparently, patchwork
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> perhaps because it
>> wasn't inline. Is this something to worry about? Specifically, I believe the
>> patch is a candidate for the stable branch, and I added the appropriate Cc:
>> in t
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 29.10.2015 10:24, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> On 10/29/15, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29.10.2015 01:52, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
On 10/26/15, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>
> On 25.10.2015 02:00, Ivan Kalvachev wr
On 29.10.2015 10:24, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
[snip]
On 10/29/15, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 29.10.2015 01:52, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
On 10/26/15, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 25.10.2015 02:00, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
Some constants (like 1.0 and 0.5) could be inlined as immediate inputs
without using
