On 16/03/17 12:20 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 16 March 2017 at 02:57, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
P.S. It would be better to put the mesa
On 16 March 2017 at 02:57, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
>>> this kind of e-m
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> I think Bcc'ing also means my gmail filters wouldn't know it came from
>>> the announce list.
>>
>> listid:mesa-announce.freedesk
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> I think Bcc'ing also means my gmail filters wouldn't know it came from
>> the announce list.
>
> listid:mesa-announce.freedesktop.org should pick it up - even though
> it's bcc'd, the mai
On 16/03/17 11:57 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
>>> this kind of e-mails,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
>> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to:
>>
On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to:
> mesa-dev seems useless for that.
>
So for 13.0.6-rc1 I've ad
On 14/03/17 03:27 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 14/03/17 03:13 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> BTW, in that case it might be good to
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 14/03/17 03:13 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 03/03/17 03:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Putting mesa-announce@ in Bcc seems li
On 14/03/17 03:13 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 03/03/17 03:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>>
Putting mesa-announce@ in Bcc seems like the wrong thing to do.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Still curious why
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> I think Bcc'ing also means my gmail filters wouldn't know it came from
> the announce list.
listid:mesa-announce.freedesktop.org should pick it up - even though
it's bcc'd, the mailing list distribution logic should still throw in
its List-Id
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 03/03/17 03:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
this kind of e-mai
On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03/03/17 03:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
>>> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to:
>>> mesa
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to:
> mesa-dev seems useless for that.
GMail seems to ignore Reply-to.
Putting mesa-announce@ in Bcc se
On 2 March 2017 at 17:42, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> I think that general message style sounds fine.
>
Ack.
>
> How's this? Trying a new Android email app.
>
Perfect and thanks for the email client suggestion. Glad we have one
that is flexible enough.
-Emil
_
On March 2, 2017 09:28:08 Emil Velikov wrote:
On 2 March 2017 at 16:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mar 2, 2017 3:38 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
On 1 March 2017 at 20:06, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
Hello list,
The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.
On 2 March 2017 at 16:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2017 3:38 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>
> On 1 March 2017 at 20:06, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currentl
On Mar 2, 2017 3:38 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
On 1 March 2017 at 20:06, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
>> - 60 queued
>> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
>
On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
>> - 60 queued
>> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
>> - and 0 rejected patch(es)
>>
>>
>> The current queue consists
On 1 March 2017 at 20:06, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
>> - 60 queued
>> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
>> - and 0 rejected patch(es)
>>
>>
>> The curre
On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
> - 60 queued
> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
> - and 0 rejected patch(es)
>
>
> The current queue consists of:
>
> On the GLX/EGL front we have a GLVND fix for "T
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
> - 60 queued
> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
> - and 0 rejected patch(es)
>
>
> The current queue consists of:
>
> On the GLX/EGL front we have a GLVND f
Hello list,
The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
- 60 queued
- 9 nominated (outstanding)
- and 0 rejected patch(es)
The current queue consists of:
On the GLX/EGL front we have a GLVND fix for "The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth"
and other games, eglQuerySurface n
23 matches
Mail list logo
