On Friday 10 May 2013 14:17:47 Eric Anholt wrote:
> Andreas Hartmetz writes:
> > On Wednesday 08 May 2013 13:33:37 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> Christoph Brill writes:
> >> > Hi list,
> >> >
> >> > I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev
> >> > and
> >> > really like the proce
Andreas Hartmetz writes:
> On Wednesday 08 May 2013 13:33:37 Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Christoph Brill writes:
>> > Hi list,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev and
>> > really like the process of how they get reviewed. It's a good way of
>> > catching bugs bef
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 13:33:37 Eric Anholt wrote:
> Christoph Brill writes:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev and
> > really like the process of how they get reviewed. It's a good way of
> > catching bugs before they get committed. But current
Christoph Brill writes:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev and
> really like the process of how they get reviewed. It's a good way of
> catching bugs before they get committed. But currently this approach
> has a downside (at least for me): It's easy to
Hi list,
I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev and
really like the process of how they get reviewed. It's a good way of
catching bugs before they get committed. But currently this approach
has a downside (at least for me): It's easy to miss a patch and
happens from time t
