On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Did you want pointer for timeout in the userspace api? I don't feel
> strongly about it, I just didn't see a use. The equivalent API I could
> think of was select(), where apparently linux returns time unwaited,
> while "everyone else" doe
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:07:57 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > I guess GL_ALREADY_SIGNALED handling will be done using a check for
> > bo_busy() before calling this.
>
> I've just read through the mesa code and gl_already_signalled seems to
> b
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I guess GL_ALREADY_SIGNALED handling will be done using a check for
> bo_busy() before calling this.
I've just read through the mesa code and gl_already_signalled seems to
be handled already by core mesa code in _mesa_ClientWaitSync (if the
dr
On Sun, 27 May 2012 13:16:54 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> index b776d2f..695a449 100644
> --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
> @@ -1478,6 +1478,32 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_wait_rendering(drm_intel_bo *bo)
>
The kernel patches have now landed in Daniel's -next-queued tree.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:54:11 -0700
From: Ben Widawsky
To: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: add a timed wait function
drm_intel_gem_bo_wait(bo, &tim
