On Dec 15, 2016 6:40 AM, "Jani Nikula" wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> The AST does include comments right above each cursor, but it falls
>> short for comments not attached t
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> The AST does include comments right above each cursor, but it falls
>> short for comments not attached to cursors. You have to walk the tokens
>> for th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Hey All,
> I don't figure this will be terribl
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Robert Bragg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>>
Hey All,
I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
aren't I?) but h
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>
>>> Hey All,
>>> I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
>>> aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
>>
On 12/13/2016 09:46 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Hey All,
> I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be
> wrong, aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
> documentation focus, as far as we have one, to sphinx? Right now,
> Gallium uses sphinx for docu
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
>> Hey All,
>> I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
>> aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
>> documentation focus, as far as we have one, to sphinx? Ri
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 2:47:27 PM PST Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > Hey All,
> > I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
> > aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
> > documentation focus, as far as we have one
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > Hey All,
> > I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be
> wrong,
> > aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
> > documentation focus, as far as we have one, to sphi
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2016-12-13 12:46:17)
> Hey All,
> I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
> aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary" documentation
> focus, as far as we have one, to sphinx? Right now, Gallium uses sphinx for
> docum
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Hey All,
> I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
> aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
> documentation focus, as far as we have one, to sphinx? Right now, Gallium
> uses sphinx for documenting all of it's "
Hey All,
I don't figure this will be terribly controversial (I'm about to be wrong,
aren't I?) but how do people feel about switching our "primary"
documentation focus, as far as we have one, to sphinx? Right now, Gallium
uses sphinx for documenting all of it's "public" interfaces. A while ago,
C
12 matches
Mail list logo
