-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2011 02:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 07:38 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> On 08/25/2011 07:03 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> That's a fair point. Since we have a clean mechanism to improve those
>>> interfaces (e.g., DRI2
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 07:38 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 07:03 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > That's a fair point. Since we have a clean mechanism to improve those
> > interfaces (e.g., DRI2!), there's relatively little cost in keeping that
> > code around.
> >
> > I'd usually be pr
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
>> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
>> M
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I've put up an initial branch at
>
> git://people.freedesktop.org:~idr/mesa kill-old-drivers
Acked-by: Marek Olšák
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freed
>
> [*] keeping up with DRM in linux is hard work. you guys are
> very active.
Its all the hw manufactures fault really, they make GPUs too complex
and release them too quick :-)
Dave.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lis
On 08/26/11 01:52, matthew green wrote:
> [*] keeping up with DRM in linux is hard work. you guys are
> very active.
Absolutely agreed there, but the only working DRM module we ship
at the moment is a KMS/DRI2 version of i915, so I have no objections
to losing the Mesa support for the DRI1 module
2011/8/26 Kristian Høgsberg :
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:52 AM, matthew green wrote:
>>
>> hi folks,
>>
>>> - Remove all DRI1 drivers: i810, mach64, mga, r128, savage, sis, tdfx,
>>> and unichrome.
>>
>> over in netbsd land we're still lagging on DRI2 support[*]. of
>> the above cards, i've har
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:52 AM, matthew green wrote:
>
> hi folks,
>
>> - Remove all DRI1 drivers: i810, mach64, mga, r128, savage, sis, tdfx,
>> and unichrome.
>
> over in netbsd land we're still lagging on DRI2 support[*]. of
> the above cards, i've hard successful reports on mach64, mga,
> r
hi folks,
> - Remove all DRI1 drivers: i810, mach64, mga, r128, savage, sis, tdfx,
> and unichrome.
over in netbsd land we're still lagging on DRI2 support[*]. of
the above cards, i've hard successful reports on mach64, mga,
r128 and tdfx in the last couple of years, though the only cards i
kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2011 07:38 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 07:03 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 08/24/2011 05:07 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
On 08/25/2011 07:38 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but...doesn't changing dd_function_table break the
> old libGL/new DRI driver API/ABI? Or, is that different?
Nevermind, wrong interface.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.fre
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 07:03 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 08/24/2011 05:07 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2011 12:11
On 08/25/2011 07:03 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 05:07 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
I'd like to propose giving the ax to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2011 05:07 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bu
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 20:46 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> > drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring an
On Don, 2011-08-25 at 02:07 +0200, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> >>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
>> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
>> M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2011 12:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me problems for a
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 19:41, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:34:44PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > I'll also point out that DRI2 isn't the only problem. There are a lot
> > of refactors and optimizations that I'd like to do that will benefit
> > more modern cards. Howev
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:34:44PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> I'll also point out that DRI2 isn't the only problem. There are a lot
> of refactors and optimizations that I'd like to do that will benefit
> more modern cards. However, due to missing (hardware) features and lack
> of a maintain
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:28:14PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
>> Ian's list of DRI1 drivers: i810, mach64, mga, r128, savage, sis,
>> tdfx, and unichrome. I have mga, r128, savage, sis, tdfx hardware, but
>> not the time to maintain it, let
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:28:14PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:50:25PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> >> +1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
> >>
> >> Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2011 03:28 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:50:25PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
>>> +1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
>>>
>>> Sending from a mobile, pard
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:14:21AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:50:25PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> > +1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
> >
> > Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
>
> *sigh* Software populism...
>
> But seriously. How would su
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:50:25PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
>> +1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
>>
>> Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
>
> *sigh* Software populism...
>
> But seriously. How would such a thing wor
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of
> core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me problems for a
> num
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:50:25PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote:
> +1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
>
> Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
*sigh* Software populism...
But seriously. How would such a thing work?
Drivers will be thrown out because none of those currently ch
On 8/24/2011 2:47 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dee Sharpe
wrote:
On 8/24/2011 2:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactor
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:11:32PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been ca
My Voodoo3 3500 AGP just wept.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:11:32 -0700, Ian Romanick
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> > drivers. I've been
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:11:32 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained drivers.
Die, Hoke Colburn, Die! :)
(Sorry for that.)
--
g
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
+1. If anybody needs them, they're in git.
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On 08/24/2011 01:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me problems for a numb
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dee Sharpe
wrote:
> On 8/24/2011 2:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
>> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
>>
On 8/24/2011 2:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me problems for a number
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
> drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
> Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to propose giving the ax to a bunch of old, unmaintained
drivers. I've been doing a bunch of refactoring and reworking of core
Mesa code, and these drivers have been causing me problems for a number
of reasons.
1. The hardware is so old that
39 matches
Mail list logo
