On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 17:53 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 12:05 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I don't think that using getTypeAllocSize() instead of
> >> >>> getTypeStoreSize() to calculate clover::argument::size would be a
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 12:05 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't think that using getTypeAllocSize() instead of
>> >>> getTypeStoreSize() to calculate clover::argument::size would be a
>> >>> satisfactory solution. By doing that you'd redefine the API argu
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 12:05 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I don't think that using getTypeAllocSize() instead of
> >>> getTypeStoreSize() to calculate clover::argument::size would be a
> >>> satisfactory solution. By doing that you'd redefine the API argument
> >>> size exposed to th
Francisco Jerez writes:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:49 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> >> I think this is what v96:128 is for
>>> >> > according to [0], it specifi
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:49 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> I think this is what v96:128 is for
>> >> > according to [0], it specifies only alignment, not size. I could
On Apr 24, 2014, at 0:30 , Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:49 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> I think this is what v96:128 is for
> according to [0], it specifies only alignment
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:49 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >> I think this is what v96:128 is for
> >> > according to [0], it specifies only alignment, not size. I could not
> >> > find an __attribute
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
>
>
>> >> I think this is what v96:128 is for
>> > according to [0], it specifies only alignment, not size. I could not
>> > find an __attribute__ that would change size either.
>> >
>> > It should be possible to have
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 17:50 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> >> I think this is what v96:128 is for
> > according to [0], it specifies only alignment, not size. I could not
> > find an __attribute__ that would change size either.
> >
> > It should be possible to have ADMGPUDataLayout: public DataLa
On 04/22/2014 05:22 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:40 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
On 04/22/2014 02:35 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:02:27PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a problem caused by this part of the OCL specs (6.1.5
Alignment of Types):
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:40 -0700, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 02:35 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:02:27PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I ran into a problem caused by this part of the OCL specs (6.1.5
> >> Alignment of Types):
> >> "For 3-component
On 04/22/2014 02:35 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:02:27PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a problem caused by this part of the OCL specs (6.1.5
Alignment of Types):
"For 3-component vector data types, the size of the data type is 4 *
sizeof(component)."
and the cor
12 matches
Mail list logo
