On 02.05.2016 20:01, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 2 May 2016 at 11:44, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> So, what is this based on? Maybe I'm not looking in the right place, but
>>> out of hundreds of changes in Git touching those files, I see one change
>>>
On 04.05.2016 00:11, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:44:34AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Cl
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Eric Engestrom
wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:11:56AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I've renamed to REVIEWERS and scripts/get_reviewer.pl and updated
>> the verbage appropriately.
>
> scripts/get_reviewer.pl still obeys .get_maintainer.conf and
> .get_maint
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:11:56AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> Ok, I've renamed to REVIEWERS and scripts/get_reviewer.pl and updated
> the verbage appropriately.
scripts/get_reviewer.pl still obeys .get_maintainer.conf and
.get_maintainer.ignore. Is that something we want to make more
consistent?
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:44:34AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> >> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:44:34AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Let's let people add th
Hi,
On 2 May 2016 at 11:44, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> So, what is this based on? Maybe I'm not looking in the right place, but
>> out of hundreds of changes in Git touching those files, I see one change
>> from you about six months ago and five ch
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Let's let people add themselves to the file if they want. No point in
trying to populat
On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> Let's let people add themselves to the file if they want. No point in
>>> trying to populate it up front.
>>
>> yeah, I expect people to add themselves
Hi,
On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Let's let people add themselves to the file if they want. No point in
>> trying to populate it up front.
>
> yeah, I expect people to add themselves, and for the MAINTAINERS file
> to evolve
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
>> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
>> down MAINTAIN
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
> down MAINTAINER file syntax to recognize that we don't really have
> subsy
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Speaking of maintainers... I have a patch somewhere that adds you as
>> maintainer for $linux/drivers/drm/gpu/msm/.
>> Guess I should send it already ;-)
>>
>> On 19 Apri
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Speaking of maintainers... I have a patch somewhere that adds you as
> maintainer for $linux/drivers/drm/gpu/msm/.
> Guess I should send it already ;-)
>
> On 19 April 2016 at 22:11, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Copi
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Speaking of maintainers... I have a patch somewhere that adds you as
> maintainer for $linux/drivers/drm/gpu/msm/.
> Guess I should send it already ;-)
>
> On 19 April 2016 at 22:11, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Copi
Hi Rob,
Speaking of maintainers... I have a patch somewhere that adds you as
maintainer for $linux/drivers/drm/gpu/msm/.
Guess I should send it already ;-)
On 19 April 2016 at 22:11, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
> recog
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 04/19/2016 02:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>>
>>> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
>>> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel
On 04/19/2016 02:36 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 04/19/2016 02:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>>
>>> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
>>> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree),
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 02:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
>> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
>> down MAINTAINER file syntax to r
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
> down MAINTAINER file syntax to recognize that we don't really have
> subsystem "mai
On 04/19/2016 02:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
> recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
> down MAINTAINER file syntax to recognize that we don't really have
> subsystem "maintainers"
From: Rob Clark
Copied from linux kernel, with minimal changes to script (just to
recognize mesa src tree rather than linux kernel src tree), and slimmed
down MAINTAINER file syntax to recognize that we don't really have
subsystem "maintainers" in the same sense as the linux kernel (ie. no
differ
22 matches
Mail list logo
