On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 14:38 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:21:57 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the DRI state tracker sends the bits per pixel (bpp) value in
> > the format member of a
> > getbufferswithformat request, and assumes it can reinterpret the f
On 12/05/2011 11:38 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:21:57 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
Hi!
Currently the DRI state tracker sends the bits per pixel (bpp) value in
the format member of a
getbufferswithformat request, and assumes it can reinterpret the format
of the returned
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:21:57 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently the DRI state tracker sends the bits per pixel (bpp) value in
> the format member of a
> getbufferswithformat request, and assumes it can reinterpret the format
> of the returned buffer to something else
> with an
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 15:21 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
> Currently the DRI state tracker sends the bits per pixel (bpp) value in
> the format member of a
> getbufferswithformat request, and assumes it can reinterpret the format
> of the returned buffer to something else
> with an identica
Hi!
Currently the DRI state tracker sends the bits per pixel (bpp) value in
the format member of a
getbufferswithformat request, and assumes it can reinterpret the format
of the returned buffer to something else
with an identical bpp.
That doesn't really work for vmwgfx. We can't reinterpret
