2010/9/7 Kristian Høgsberg :
But the dri2 extension's version 2 doesn't actually mean "this driver
can create and bind contexts without drawables"--and right now only
the intel drivers can.
>>>
>>> No, that is actually one of the implied features of version 2 of the
>>> DRI2 extensio
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:35 PM, nobled wrote:
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM, nobled wrote:
>>> The current egl_dri2 code for enabling the EGL_KHR_surfaceless_*
>>> extensions is a bit broken right now. First, the code in dri_util.c
>>> and drisw_util.c doesn't ch
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM, nobled wrote:
>> The current egl_dri2 code for enabling the EGL_KHR_surfaceless_*
>> extensions is a bit broken right now. First, the code in dri_util.c
>> and drisw_util.c doesn't check if it gets passed a NULL __DRIconfig*,
>> leading
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM, nobled wrote:
> The current egl_dri2 code for enabling the EGL_KHR_surfaceless_*
> extensions is a bit broken right now. First, the code in dri_util.c
> and drisw_util.c doesn't check if it gets passed a NULL __DRIconfig*,
> leading to segfaults when egl_dri2 does
The current egl_dri2 code for enabling the EGL_KHR_surfaceless_*
extensions is a bit broken right now. First, the code in dri_util.c
and drisw_util.c doesn't check if it gets passed a NULL __DRIconfig*,
leading to segfaults when egl_dri2 does exactly that when creating a
surfaceless context.
Secon
