On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:05:48PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 11:36 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> > wrote:
> >> On 04/08/2014 10:28 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> >>> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
> >>>
> >>>
On 04/25/2014 11:36 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 04/08/2014 10:28 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
>>> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
>>>
>>> Changes from previous version:
>>>
>>> - make it clearer that the interface i
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 10:28 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
>> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
>>
>> Changes from previous version:
>>
>> - make it clearer that the interface is optional;
>
> No! this is still a NAK!
I don't agree with
On 08/04/14 21:28, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
>
> Changes from previous version:
>
> - make it clearer that the interface is optional;
>
> - fix other issues raised on the last review round.
>
Hi Ander,
I have picked up patch 1,2,3 and 5, annota
On 04/08/2014 10:28 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
>
> Changes from previous version:
>
> - make it clearer that the interface is optional;
No! this is still a NAK!
The reason is, just like the last time, that as soon as the major
drivers implement t
From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
Changes from previous version:
- make it clearer that the interface is optional;
- fix other issues raised on the last review round.
Thanks,
Ander
Ander Conselvan de Oliveira (10):
gbm/dri: Fix out-of-memory error path in dri_device_create()
gbm: Set
