On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> The heuristic we're using is rather lame, since it assumes everything is
> non-uniform and loops execute 10 times, but it should be enough for
> measuring improvements in the scheduler that don't result in a change in
> the number of instruct
The heuristic we're using is rather lame, since it assumes everything is
non-uniform and loops execute 10 times, but it should be enough for
measuring improvements in the scheduler that don't result in a change in
the number of instructions.
v2:
- Switch loops and cycle counts to be compatible wit
