On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> These are not supported by the fp64 spec though, so they are not really
> necessary. There are, however, other cases of opcodes that are not
> supported by fp64 and where we have provied a double-precision
> implementation anyway. Previ
These are not supported by the fp64 spec though, so they are not really
necessary. There are, however, other cases of opcodes that are not
supported by fp64 and where we have provied a double-precision
implementation anyway. Previous discussion in the mailing list suggested
that we might want to do
