Am 21.02.2017 um 16:44 schrieb Lars Hamre:
> That does seem nicer, then pipe->clear_texture could just be set to
> util_clear_texture.
> Tangentially, do you see anything preventing this solution being
> utilized by llvmpipe?
No, that should work just fine. llvmpipe doesn't do anything special
for
That does seem nicer, then pipe->clear_texture could just be set to
util_clear_texture.
Tangentially, do you see anything preventing this solution being
utilized by llvmpipe?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 20.02.2017 um 18:01 schrieb Lars Hamre:
>> v2: rework util
Am 20.02.2017 um 18:01 schrieb Lars Hamre:
> v2: rework util clear functions such that they operate on a resource
> instead of a surface (Roland Scheidegger)
>
> Implements the ARB_clear_texture extension for softpipe.
> Passes all corresponding piglit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Hamre
>
v2: rework util clear functions such that they operate on a resource
instead of a surface (Roland Scheidegger)
Implements the ARB_clear_texture extension for softpipe.
Passes all corresponding piglit tests.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hamre
---
CC: Roland Scheidegger
NOTE: someone with access wi
