On 11/10/18 6:59 pm, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 10/10/18 11:46 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 11/10/18 1:46 am, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
We shouldn't try to compact any varyings known as always
active IO, especially XFB outputs. For example, if one
component of an xfb output is also used as inpu
On 10/10/18 11:46 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 11/10/18 1:46 am, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
We shouldn't try to compact any varyings known as always
active IO, especially XFB outputs. For example, if one
component of an xfb output is also used as input varying
in the next stage, it shouldn't be
On 11/10/18 1:46 am, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
We shouldn't try to compact any varyings known as always
active IO, especially XFB outputs. For example, if one
component of an xfb output is also used as input varying
in the next stage, it shouldn't be compacted.
This small helper just marks all XF
We shouldn't try to compact any varyings known as always
active IO, especially XFB outputs. For example, if one
component of an xfb output is also used as input varying
in the next stage, it shouldn't be compacted.
This small helper just marks all XFB varyings as always_active_io
in the consumer t
