On Sat, 2018-09-01 at 02:14 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Juan, should we also include this in the stable queues ?
>
Unless Daniel has a different opinion, yes, it should be included. Forgot to CC
to stable.
Thanks!
J.A.
>
> On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 13:59 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wro
Juan, should we also include this in the stable queues ?
On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 13:59 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> If color buffer is locked, do not set its wayland buffer to NULL;
> otherwise it can not be freed later.
>
> Rather, flag it in order to destroy it later on the release even
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 12:59, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> If color buffer is locked, do not set its wayland buffer to NULL;
> otherwise it can not be freed later.
>
> Rather, flag it in order to destroy it later on the release event.
>
> v2: instruct release event to unlock only or free wl_buff
If color buffer is locked, do not set its wayland buffer to NULL;
otherwise it can not be freed later.
Rather, flag it in order to destroy it later on the release event.
v2: instruct release event to unlock only or free wl_buffer too (Daniel)
This also fixes dEQP-EGL.functional.swap_buffers_with
