On Apr 10, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 02:51 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:59 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 10.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:07 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.04.2013 11:46,
On 04/10/2013 02:51 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:59 +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 10.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:07 +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 10.04.2013 11:46, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
But why the heck is multiplying with 0x4f800
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:59 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> > On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:07 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 10.04.2013 11:46, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> >>
> >> But why the heck is multiplying with 0x4f80 fixing the result?
> > I'
Am 10.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:07 +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 10.04.2013 11:46, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
21 more little piglits with radeonsi.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
You figured it out, great!
I figured out what? :) This i
On Mit, 2013-04-10 at 12:07 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.04.2013 11:46, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> > From: Michel Dänzer
> >
> > 21 more little piglits with radeonsi.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
> You figured it out, great!
I figured out what? :) This is the same patch I sent ou
Am 10.04.2013 11:46, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer
21 more little piglits with radeonsi.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
You figured it out, great! But why the heck is multiplying with
0x4f80 fixing the result?
Cheers,
Christian.
---
v2: Now with lit test.
lib/Target/R6
From: Michel Dänzer
21 more little piglits with radeonsi.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
---
v2: Now with lit test.
lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td | 11 +--
test/CodeGen/R600/urecip.ll | 12
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tes
