On Monday, 2017-08-21 18:09:01 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 14:33, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Monday, 2017-08-21 11:27:20 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> From: Emil Velikov
> >>
> >> Flesh the duplicated functionality to a helper.
> >> Use const char * + sscanf to keep the
On 21 August 2017 at 14:33, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Monday, 2017-08-21 11:27:20 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> Flesh the duplicated functionality to a helper.
>> Use const char * + sscanf to keep the compiler happy.
>
> Can you explain why you replaced strtol() with ssc
On Monday, 2017-08-21 11:27:20 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Flesh the duplicated functionality to a helper.
> Use const char * + sscanf to keep the compiler happy.
Can you explain why you replaced strtol() with sscanf() in the commit
message?
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom
From: Emil Velikov
Flesh the duplicated functionality to a helper.
Use const char * + sscanf to keep the compiler happy.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
A bit more could be fleshed out into helper(s). This is enough to keep
the compiler happy w/o being too invasive.
---
run.c | 20
