Internal addrlib doesn't contain BRAHMA_BUILD, so removing that
definition is safe.
The assert change is also OK. We'll just discard any new addrlib code
that might replace it, because standard C assert is the only think we
need.
Marek
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Eric Engestrom
wrote:
> O
On Friday, 2017-11-24 19:20:12 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
>
> Marek
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Eric Engestrom
> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> > ---
> > src/amd/Android.addrlib.mk | 2 --
> > src/amd/Makefile.addrlib.am
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Eric Engestrom
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> ---
> src/amd/Android.addrlib.mk | 2 --
> src/amd/Makefile.addrlib.am | 3 +--
> src/amd/addrlib/core/addrcommon.h| 15 ++-
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
---
src/amd/Android.addrlib.mk | 2 --
src/amd/Makefile.addrlib.am | 3 +--
src/amd/addrlib/core/addrcommon.h| 15 ++-
src/amd/addrlib/meson.build | 2 +-
src/gallium/winsys/amdgpu/drm/Android.mk | 4 +--
