On Thursday, 2018-03-22 11:17:55 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-03-22 05:08:55)
> > On Monday, 2018-03-12 10:16:33 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > > Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-03-12 09:09:50)
> > > > On 12 March 2018 at 15:01, Eric Engestrom
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Signed
Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-03-22 05:08:55)
> On Monday, 2018-03-12 10:16:33 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-03-12 09:09:50)
> > > On 12 March 2018 at 15:01, Eric Engestrom
> > > wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> > > > ---
> > > > Dylan, was there any reaso
On Monday, 2018-03-12 10:16:33 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-03-12 09:09:50)
> > On 12 March 2018 at 15:01, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> > > ---
> > > Dylan, was there any reason to have -Werror=missing-prototypes and
> > > -Werror=implicit-
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-03-12 09:09:50)
> On 12 March 2018 at 15:01, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> > ---
> > Dylan, was there any reason to have -Werror=missing-prototypes and
> > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration in C but not C++?
> > Both sound to me like some
On 12 March 2018 at 15:01, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
> ---
> Dylan, was there any reason to have -Werror=missing-prototypes and
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration in C but not C++?
> Both sound to me like something we always want.
Seems to be copied from the auto
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom
---
Dylan, was there any reason to have -Werror=missing-prototypes and
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration in C but not C++?
Both sound to me like something we always want.
---
meson.build | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
di
