Quoting Daniel Stone (2017-03-27 04:59:13)
> On 27 March 2017 at 12:50, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> gst-decoder.c:189:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> >> only once for each function it appears in
> >> Makefile:613: recipe for t
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> I'm undecided about whether or not to keep the autotools build. I
> know there is some OE recipe floating around to build kmscube (since
> it really is the killer-app of the embedded world :-P), but otherwise
> probably aren't many/any distro'
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 26 March 2017 at 14:59, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
>> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
>> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 27 March 2017 at 12:50, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> gst-decoder.c:189:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
>>> only once for each function it appears in
>>> Makefile:613: recip
On 27 March 2017 at 12:50, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> gst-decoder.c:189:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
>> only once for each function it appears in
>> Makefile:613: recipe for target 'kmscube-gst-decoder.o' failed
>> make: *** [km
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
>> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
>> took maybe ~1hr to conv
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
> before). The buil
Hey Rob,
On 26 March 2017 at 14:59, Rob Clark wrote:
> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
> before). The build spee
On 26 March 2017 at 14:59, Rob Clark wrote:
> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
> before). The build speed is defin
On Sunday, 2017-03-26 09:59:51 -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
> before). The build spee
Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
before). The build speed is definitely faster even after Emil's auto-
tools improvemen
Quoting Rob Clark (2017-03-25 13:11:46)
> Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
> bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
> took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
> before). The build speed is definitely
Figured I should figure out what this meson stuff is all about. After a
bit of hunting around to find examples to look at (and interruptions) it
took maybe ~1hr to convert (for someone who never looked at meson
before). The build speed is definitely faster even after Emil's auto-
tools improvemen
13 matches
Mail list logo
