On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:36 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 14:14 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> > > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
> > > > wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 14:14 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Timothy Arceri > > wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri <
>> >
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 14:14 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Timothy Arceri > wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> > > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
> > > wrote:
> > > > This allows the c
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri
>> wrote:
>> > This allows the correct offset to be easily calculated for indirect
>> > indexing when a struct array contains multiple
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 08:09 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > > This allows the correct offset to be easily calculated for
> > > indirect
> > > indexi
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri
> wrote:
> > This allows the correct offset to be easily calculated for indirect
> > indexing when a struct array contains multiple samplers, or any crazy
> > nesting.
> >
> > The indices for
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> This allows the correct offset to be easily calculated for indirect
> indexing when a struct array contains multiple samplers, or any crazy
> nesting.
>
> The indices for the folling struct will now look like this:
> Sampler index: 0 Name: s[
This allows the correct offset to be easily calculated for indirect
indexing when a struct array contains multiple samplers, or any crazy
nesting.
The indices for the folling struct will now look like this:
Sampler index: 0 Name: s[0].tex
Sampler index: 1 Name: s[1].tex
Sampler index: 2 Name: s[0]