On 12 October 2017 at 18:06, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 12/10/17 06:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 12 October 2017 at 17:33, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2017 07:14 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 12/10/17 06:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 12 October 2017 at 17:33, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On 10/12/2017 07:14 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
>
On 12 October 2017 at 17:33, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 07:14 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote
On 10/12/2017 07:14 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
On 12/10/17 04:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> F
On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> A while back Miche
On 5 October 2017 at 18:11, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> A while back Miche
On 10/05/2017 08:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
On 5 October 2017 at 16:16, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> From: Emil Velikov
>>>
>>> A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
>>> symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is
On 10/05/2017 06:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
>> symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is the first upstream
>> version to actually has it.
>
>
On 05/10/17 04:27 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 October 2017 at 14:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> From: Emil Velikov
>>>
>>> A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
>>> symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is t
On 5 October 2017 at 14:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
>> symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is the first upstream
>> version to actually has it.
On 05/10/17 12:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
> symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is the first upstream
> version to actually has it.
Not exactly. Adam Jackson originally added symbol versi
From: Emil Velikov
A while back Michel reported that LLVM has symbol versioning to avoid
symbol collisions. Based on observations LLVM 5.0 is the first upstream
version to actually has it.
The Debian/Ubuntu packaging has local patches for that, going back to
LLVM 3.7.
Since symbol collisions do
14 matches
Mail list logo