On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > The NIR story on conversion opcodes is a mess. We've had way too many
> > of them, naming is inconsistent, and which ones have explicit sizes was
> > sort-of random. This commit re-organizes things and makes them
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> The NIR story on conversion opcodes is a mess. We've had way too many
> of them, naming is inconsistent, and which ones have explicit sizes was
> sort-of random. This commit re-organizes things and makes them all
> consistent:
>
> - All non-bool conversion opcodes now
The NIR story on conversion opcodes is a mess. We've had way too many
of them, naming is inconsistent, and which ones have explicit sizes was
sort-of random. This commit re-organizes things and makes them all
consistent:
- All non-bool conversion opcodes now have the explicit size in the
des
