Am 28.11.2012 13:47, schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
> On 11/22/2012 07:33 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Am 22.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
>>> Mostly PowerPC system sets the Altivec NJ bit to 1 so denormal number
>>> are handled as 0. Initially it was a performance configuration, sinc
On 11/22/2012 07:33 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 22.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
>> Mostly PowerPC system sets the Altivec NJ bit to 1 so denormal number
>> are handled as 0. Initially it was a performance configuration, since
>> denormal handling tended to be costly. However it
Am 22.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Adhemerval Zanella:
> Mostly PowerPC system sets the Altivec NJ bit to 1 so denormal number
> are handled as 0. Initially it was a performance configuration, since
> denormal handling tended to be costly. However it is not the case on
> more recent PowerPC chips (POWER6
Mostly PowerPC system sets the Altivec NJ bit to 1 so denormal number
are handled as 0. Initially it was a performance configuration, since
denormal handling tended to be costly. However it is not the case on
more recent PowerPC chips (POWER6 and onwards).
This patch enforces the clear of NJ bit i
