On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 23.10.2017 13:50, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Nicolai Hähnle
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Nicolai Hähnle
>>>
>>> Fences are now 4 bytes instead of 96 bytes (on my 64-bit system).
>>>
>>> Signaling a fence
On 23.10.2017 13:50, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
From: Nicolai Hähnle
Fences are now 4 bytes instead of 96 bytes (on my 64-bit system).
Signaling a fence is a single atomic operation in the fast case plus a
syscall in the slow case.
Testin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> From: Nicolai Hähnle
>
> Fences are now 4 bytes instead of 96 bytes (on my 64-bit system).
>
> Signaling a fence is a single atomic operation in the fast case plus a
> syscall in the slow case.
>
> Testing if a fence is signaled is the same
From: Nicolai Hähnle
Fences are now 4 bytes instead of 96 bytes (on my 64-bit system).
Signaling a fence is a single atomic operation in the fast case plus a
syscall in the slow case.
Testing if a fence is signaled is the same as before (a simple comparison),
but waiting on a fence is now no mo
