Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Overall this looks correct. I've got a few nits below and I'd like to take
> a look at it with fresh eyes before giving an R-B as it's complicated
> especially with all of the stuff to handle non-ssa. Not sure if it's
> really worth doing non-ssa now that I see how much
Overall this looks correct. I've got a few nits below and I'd like to take
a look at it with fresh eyes before giving an R-B as it's complicated
especially with all of the stuff to handle non-ssa. Not sure if it's
really worth doing non-ssa now that I see how much more complicated it
makes things
This is the equivalent of brw_fs_channel_expressions.cpp, which I wanted
for vc4.
---
This series, plus a commit to make i965 use it instead of channel_expressions,
is on the nir-scalarize branch of my mesa tree. With the whole series, there
are 6 regressions, 3 of which are due to lower-vec-to-m
