On 04/06/2013 05:09 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:26:40AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
Now that we require 2.6.39, there's no need to also check for 2.6.29.
Calling drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs() without checking
should be safe, as it simply sets a flag.
This
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:26:40AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Now that we require 2.6.39, there's no need to also check for 2.6.29.
> Calling drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs() without checking
> should be safe, as it simply sets a flag.
>
> This does remove the check for zero fences
Now that we require 2.6.39, there's no need to also check for 2.6.29.
Calling drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs() without checking
should be safe, as it simply sets a flag.
This does remove the check for zero fences available, but that doesn't
seem worth checking.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth G
