On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 20:10 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> From: Jason Ekstrand
>
> It's nearly the same so there's no good reason why it can't be in a
> common function. The one difference is that _mesa_store_teximage
> calls AllocTextureImageBuffer for us, while _mesa_store_texsubimage
> does
From: Jason Ekstrand
It's nearly the same so there's no good reason why it can't be in a
common function. The one difference is that _mesa_store_teximage
calls AllocTextureImageBuffer for us, while _mesa_store_texsubimage
doesn't, but we don't need that anyway - intelTexImage already does it.
R