Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/9] i965: Make intel_miptree_map_raw static

2015-09-10 Thread Ian Romanick
On 09/10/2015 11:52 AM, Anuj Phogat wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Ian Romanick > wrote: > > From: Ian Romanick > > > This hasn't been used outside intel_mipmap_tree.c since d5d4ba9 started > using met

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/9] i965: Make intel_miptree_map_raw static

2015-09-10 Thread Anuj Phogat
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > This hasn't been used outside intel_mipmap_tree.c since d5d4ba9 started > using meta instead of the blitter for PBO TexSubImage. While we're here, > > 1. s/intel_miptree_\([^_]\)_raw/miptree_\1_raw/g because we don't >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/9] i965: Make intel_miptree_map_raw static

2015-09-09 Thread Ian Romanick
On 09/09/2015 07:18 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > This hasn't been used outside intel_mipmap_tree.c since d5d4ba9 started > using meta instead of the blitter for PBO TexSubImage. While we're here, > > 1. s/intel_miptree_\([^_]\)_raw/miptree_\1_raw/g because we don't > general

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/9] i965: Make intel_miptree_map_raw static

2015-09-09 Thread Ian Romanick
From: Ian Romanick This hasn't been used outside intel_mipmap_tree.c since d5d4ba9 started using meta instead of the blitter for PBO TexSubImage. While we're here, 1. s/intel_miptree_\([^_]\)_raw/miptree_\1_raw/g because we don't generally prefix static functions. 2. Remove the unused brw para