On 03/11/2015 12:01 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:29:02 AM Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 03/09/2015 01:58 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>>> We can't safely call nir_optimize() with register present, since several
>>> passes called in the loop can't handle registers, and will
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:29:02 AM Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 01:58 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > We can't safely call nir_optimize() with register present, since several
> > passes called in the loop can't handle registers, and will fail asserts.
>
> Doesn't that mean this patch s
On 03/09/2015 01:58 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> We can't safely call nir_optimize() with register present, since several
> passes called in the loop can't handle registers, and will fail asserts.
Doesn't that mean this patch should go before patch 2?
> Notably, nir_lower_vec_alus() and nir_opt_a
We can't safely call nir_optimize() with register present, since several
passes called in the loop can't handle registers, and will fail asserts.
Notably, nir_lower_vec_alus() and nir_opt_algebraic() really don't want
registers.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_f
