On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:15:22 -0700, "Ian Romanick" wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> The previous implementation could easily get tricked if the LHS of an
> assignment included a non-constant index that was "inside" another
> dereference. For example:
>
> mat4 m[2];
> m[0][i] = vec4(0.0)
From: Ian Romanick
The previous implementation could easily get tricked if the LHS of an
assignment included a non-constant index that was "inside" another
dereference. For example:
mat4 m[2];
m[0][i] = vec4(0.0);
Due to the way it tracked whether the array was being assigned, it
would