On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:33 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > This does introduce a warning by the automake build system, that the
> > missing-symbols test build is non-portable. That's true -- Mac OS X
> > can't take something built as a loadab
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 20:52:33 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > This does introduce a warning by the automake build system, that the
> > missing-symbols test build is non-portable. That's true -- Mac OS X
> > can't take something built as a lo
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This does introduce a warning by the automake build system, that the
> missing-symbols test build is non-portable. That's true -- Mac OS X
> can't take something built as a loadable module and just link it as a
> library. Of course, we aren't
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This does introduce a warning by the automake build system, that the
> missing-symbols test build is non-portable. That's true -- Mac OS X
> can't take something built as a loadable module and just link it as a
> library. Of course, we aren't
This does introduce a warning by the automake build system, that the
missing-symbols test build is non-portable. That's true -- Mac OS X
can't take something built as a loadable module and just link it as a
library. Of course, we aren't building this on OS X at all, so it
would be nice to be able
