On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:09:12PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> While we can simply calculate offsets to get to things such as the
> prog_data and the key, it's much more user-friendly if there are just
> pointers. Also, it's a bit more fool-proof.
>
> While we're at it, we rework the pipeline
While we can simply calculate offsets to get to things such as the
prog_data and the key, it's much more user-friendly if there are just
pointers. Also, it's a bit more fool-proof.
While we're at it, we rework the pipeline cache API to use the
brw_stage_prog_data type directly.
Signed-off-by: Ja
