On 18/09/17 21:43, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 18/09/17 20:50, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 14.09.2017 06:47, Timothy Arceri wrote:
The old code incorrectly assumed that loop terminators will always
be at the start of the loop. It really seems to be just luck that
we haven't triggered any bugs here,
On 18/09/17 20:50, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 14.09.2017 06:47, Timothy Arceri wrote:
The old code incorrectly assumed that loop terminators will always
be at the start of the loop. It really seems to be just luck that
we haven't triggered any bugs here, for example if there is a loop
terminator
On 14.09.2017 06:47, Timothy Arceri wrote:
The old code incorrectly assumed that loop terminators will always
be at the start of the loop. It really seems to be just luck that
we haven't triggered any bugs here, for example if there is a loop
terminator at the start of the loop we might actually
The old code incorrectly assumed that loop terminators will always
be at the start of the loop. It really seems to be just luck that
we haven't triggered any bugs here, for example if there is a loop
terminator at the start of the loop we might actually ignore any
other terminators that might be la
