On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:08:53 +
Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 28/03/14 08:35, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> > Emil Velikov wrote:
> >
> >> By doing GC the linker removes all the symbols that are not referenced
> >> and/or used by the final library. This results in a saving of ~100K
> >> up-to ~600K per
On 28/03/14 08:35, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:00:39 +
> Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> By doing GC the linker removes all the symbols that are not referenced
>> and/or used by the final library. This results in a saving of ~100K
>> up-to ~600K per (stripped) binary (classic vs ga
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:00:39 +
Emil Velikov wrote:
> By doing GC the linker removes all the symbols that are not referenced
> and/or used by the final library. This results in a saving of ~100K
> up-to ~600K per (stripped) binary (classic vs gallium drivers).
>
> If interested one can ask th
By doing GC the linker removes all the symbols that are not referenced
and/or used by the final library. This results in a saving of ~100K
up-to ~600K per (stripped) binary (classic vs gallium drivers).
If interested one can ask the compiler to print the sections that are
removed using -Wl,--print
