On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:33 +0200, Iago Toral wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:53 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev
>> > wrote:
>> > > From: Iago Toral Quiroga
>> > >
>> > > For the indirec
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:33 +0200, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:53 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev
> > wrote:
> > > From: Iago Toral Quiroga
> > >
> > > For the indirect case we need to take the index delivered by
> > > NIR and
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:53 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> > From: Iago Toral Quiroga
> >
> > For the indirect case we need to take the index delivered by
> > NIR and compute the parent uniform that we are accessing (the one
> > that we
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> From: Iago Toral Quiroga
>
> For the indirect case we need to take the index delivered by
> NIR and compute the parent uniform that we are accessing (the one
> that we uploaded to a surface) and the constant offset into that
> surface.
From: Iago Toral Quiroga
For the indirect case we need to take the index delivered by
NIR and compute the parent uniform that we are accessing (the one
that we uploaded to a surface) and the constant offset into that
surface.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89580
---
src/
