Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
No point in having it when just having sampler_view_planes is good enough.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
Tested-by: Andy Furniss
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
Andy Furniss wrote:
There are minor errors - when I said "Softpipe is working" I was
comparing to the past when it would render mainly junk with a shrunken
portion of the vid and later when that went away, it would render with
blocks of frame -1 mixed with current frame.
Actually with vdpau so
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Softpipe is working, that's handy - last time I tried it was too borked to be
of use, but now I can actually see which errors are software and which are
added by R600.
My observation for softpipe working correctly only seems to apply for
XVMC_MOCOMP,
if I try with X
Hey Andy,
On 12/08/2011 01:24 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> No point in having it when just having sampler_view_planes is good enough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
>>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>> - fixed borked ureg_MOV, I have no idea how it worked when I teste
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
No point in having it when just having sampler_view_planes is good enough.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
Changes since v2:
- fixed borked ureg_MOV, I have no idea how it worked when I tested this
on r600 to begin with, it renders correctly now with XvMC accele
No point in having it when just having sampler_view_planes is good enough.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
Changes since v2:
- fixed borked ureg_MOV, I have no idea how it worked when I tested this
on r600 to begin with, it renders correctly now with XvMC acceleration
for softpipe and
