Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/6] intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers (v2)

2012-07-16 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On 07/16/2012 03:02 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > From: Eric Anholt > > This means that GLX buffer sharing of these no longer works. On the > other hand, just *look* at this code reduction. It's not just the quantity---it's the *quality*! It served its purpose, but I'm really glad to see it go. -

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/6] intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers (v2)

2012-07-16 Thread Chad Versace
From: Eric Anholt This means that GLX buffer sharing of these no longer works. On the other hand, just *look* at this code reduction. v2: - [chad] Fix intelCreateBuffer for gen < 6. When the branch for !screen->hw_has_separate_stencil was taken, intel_create_private_renderbuffer was i

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/6] intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers.

2012-07-09 Thread Chad Versace
On 07/04/2012 10:52 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > This means that GLX buffer sharing of these no longer works. On the > other hand, just *look* at this code reduction. I enjoy seeing all this code die ;) I wish we had decided earlier to break GLX sharing before the ugly handshake code was written.

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/6] intel: Convert to using private depth/stencil buffers.

2012-07-04 Thread Eric Anholt
This means that GLX buffer sharing of these no longer works. On the other hand, just *look* at this code reduction. --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.c | 572 +--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c | 16 +- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.h