nl]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:59 PM
> To: Mao, David
> Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement VK_EXT_discard_rectangles.
>
> Now that I reread your email, no, that is not how we do it.
>
> For each bit i, we inte
:59 PM
> To: Mao, David
> Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement VK_EXT_discard_rectangles.
>
> Now that I reread your email, no, that is not how we do it.
>
> For each bit i, we interpret the i itself as a bitmask. So e.g. if we
ubject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement VK_EXT_discard_rectangles.
Now that I reread your email, no, that is not how we do it.
For each bit i, we interpret the i itself as a bitmask. So e.g. if we have 3
rectangles in inclusive mode, the bits set would be any i, that has at least
on
Of
> Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:34 AM
> To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> Subject: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement VK_EXT_discard_rectangles.
>
> Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2 m
f
> Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:34 AM
> To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> Subject: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement VK_EXT_discard_rectangles.
>
> Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in
,
David
-Original Message-
From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Bas
Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:34 AM
To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] radv: Implement
On 01/10/2018 11:45 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
On 01/10/2018 03:34 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2
mustpass run.
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 51
+++
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 03:34 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2
>> mustpass run.
>> ---
>> src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 51
>> +++
>>
On 01/10/2018 03:34 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2
mustpass run.
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 51 +++
src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 6 +
src/amd/vulkan/radv_extensions.
On 10 January 2018 at 12:34, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2
> mustpass run.
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie
> ---
> src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 51
> +++
> src/amd/vulkan/radv_
Tested with a modified deferred demo and no regressions in a 1.0.2
mustpass run.
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_cmd_buffer.c | 51 +++
src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 6 +
src/amd/vulkan/radv_extensions.py | 1 +
src/amd/vulkan/radv_pipeline.c| 35 ++
11 matches
Mail list logo
