> The first patch was fine. Just not the second.
First patch is a duplicate of the linked patch.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On March 11, 2019 22:17:38 Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/291616/
Ah-ha, somebody who knows what they're doing. That's good; ignore this
series then :)
The first patch was fine. Just not the second.
---
So is this a "no" for the deleting ~/mesa/sr
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/291616/
Ah-ha, somebody who knows what they're doing. That's good; ignore this
series then :)
---
So is this a "no" for the deleting ~/mesa/src idea?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
On 12/3/19 2:09 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
A better fix might be to delete the Mesa src tree, that should fix up any
warnings :P
Huh, so it does!
No regressions on dEQP, possibly since all the tests were failing to
begin with on Panfrost.
I can only assume this was sent out by mistake?
T
> A better fix might be to delete the Mesa src tree, that should fix up any
> warnings :P
Huh, so it does!
No regressions on dEQP, possibly since all the tests were failing to
begin with on Panfrost.
> I can only assume this was sent out by mistake?
This was sent out by "I don't know what I'm d
On 12/3/19 1:30 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
Fixes a gcc warning.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
---
src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c
b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c
index 9ab0a9
Fixes a gcc warning.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
---
src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c
b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_loop_unroll.c
index 9ab0a924c82..41f7a834164 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/ni
