>>>
>> Getting back on topic... what should I do? :) Check this in with the
>> new cap? Or just make it the default behaviour and let drivers that
>> can't handle it do the lowering in the driver? FWIW, I believe Dave
>> Airlie was against that, but that might have been because he was
>> implementi
On 8 May 2014 04:33, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Roland Scheidegger
>> wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.2014 17:03, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger
wrote:
> Looks good to m
Am 07.05.2014 20:33, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Roland Scheidegger
>> wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.2014 17:03, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger
wrote:
> Looks good to
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Am 06.05.2014 17:03, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger
>>> wrote:
Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
Does that mean if also t
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 06.05.2014 17:03, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger
>> wrote:
>>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> Does that mean if also the GATHER_SM5 cap is supported you have to
>>> support 4 indep
Am 06.05.2014 17:03, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Does that mean if also the GATHER_SM5 cap is supported you have to
>> support 4 independent, non-constant offsets?
>
> Not 100% sure what you're asking
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Looks good to me.
Thanks!
> Does that mean if also the GATHER_SM5 cap is supported you have to
> support 4 independent, non-constant offsets?
Not 100% sure what you're asking... but yes, for ARB_gs5 to work, you
have to support indepe
Looks good to me.
Does that mean if also the GATHER_SM5 cap is supported you have to
support 4 independent, non-constant offsets?
Would it make sense to reorder the caps so the gather stuff is all
together (now 5 cap bits just for this...)?
Roland
Am 29.04.2014 01:30, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> Signe
ping for this and 1/2 (which just adds the new cap)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
> ---
>
> The handling of the 4 offsets is less-than-pretty. I had an alternate version
> that created a new ir_dereference_array object and ran ->accept on that.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
The handling of the 4 offsets is less-than-pretty. I had an alternate version
that created a new ir_dereference_array object and ran ->accept on that. This
worked as well, but for each offset it would create a separate new array, and
then deref just one item out of
10 matches
Mail list logo
